0

Hello, "Ride"; that was an informed and intelligent comment, and I apologize for the extent of my criticism earlier. I have little tolerance for those who make derogatory comments against others while forgetting they are human beings, especially while moralizing about sexual matters. You made a valid point regarding how actresses who perform onscreen sex that is not simulated may hurt those they "are engaged or married to," but "engaged" is a gray area (think bachelor parties), and as far as those who are married, you are forgetting these are actors. Their spouses have to live with their partners doing sex scenes, if that's what the role requires (including "regular" sex scenes, unlike INTIMACY; such scenes could also be steamy, and there is a fine line. Such regular actresses, or the "non-slutty" variety as you might classify them, are also taking "money to do something that should be done for love,") You cannot speak for the dynamics of relationships of others. In the case of Kerry Fox, an actress I have never heard of, you wrote in your first comment, "She was married." Perhaps you consulted incorrect sources as "marriedbiography[DOT]com," claiming she had wed a man (Linklater) in 1995, but in fact the year was 2004 (see Fox's iMDb page). She had divorced a previous husband in 1997. See 2009 "Daily Mail" article (headline beginning with, "Actress Kerry Fox has come full circle..."). So (unlike your claim) she was unmarried at the time of INTIMACY, but per the DM article, the scene did cause friction with her then boyfriend; she felt, however, that the "experience actually strengthened their relationship." Given how some simple-minded (and "moralizing") fools in the press described the film ("that is emotionally bleak and in no way titillating") as "porn," she also describes how one reporter made her "shocked and horrified" and that "Even now I feel humiliated." it should dawn on you how your unfair negative judgments may hurt those who are fellow human beings.(Such a "moral" man as yourself is doing something very immoral. "...Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you.”) You concluded by classifying actresses in mainstream films who engage in unsimulated sex as"SLUTS." Putting aside the implication that you are so morally perfect (what are you hypocritically doing on this site, then?), you are making these actresses out to be lowdown and dirty whores. Just because you don't need to worry about libel suits in the safety of internet anonymity does not give you the right to unfairly disparage others. You should be ashamed of yourself. While "slut" is an offensive term, what is a slut anyway? At its core, it signifies a woman who enjoys sex. What is the opposite of a slut? A prude. What kind of woman would a sex-loving man prefer?

0

"Fox and Linklater were in the first first flush of their relationship, with a baby on the way, when they had to deal with the impact of Intimacy on them as a couple." (www.heraldscotland.com/news/12478062.fox-news-kerry-fox-knows-what-its-like-to-be-attacked-by-britains-press-now-the-tables-are-turned-with-her-latest-film-set-in-a-newspaper-office/)

0

I'm not ashamed of myself, and I'm not the only one who thinks this about Kerry Fox . From the below linked article: "During the Q&A session, Kerry Fox spoke of her appalling treatment by some journalists in the UK who clearly think that she is a slut for daring to do what she did. " (theguardian.com/film/movie/88779/intimacy-review) You think differently and I have no problem with that, bye.

0

I'm not ashamed of myself, and I'm not the only one who thinks this about Kerry Fox . From the below linked article: "During the Q&A session, Kerry Fox spoke of her appalling treatment by some journalists in the UK who clearly think that she is a slut for daring to do what she did. " (www.theguardian.com/film/movie/88779/intimacy-review) You think differently and I have no problem with that, bye.